Opinions about how man began have been floating around the world for thousands of years.  None has been more controversial than a SUPREME BEING versus Evolution.  We witness in the different species many forms of intelligence.  Even the smallest insect is pre-programmed to perform duties that will help sustain their future colonies.  Consider the ant for instance.  Do you believe it has been anything except an ant since it's beginning, or; would you rather believe the ant evolved from another insect?

Now then, why is it not fully accepted that man has always come from man.  That man-kind was formed from the dust of the ground.  There is undoubtedly more evidence that realizes man is the composite of many minerals contained in the soil that make up the earth.  I know there will be some that will make the argument that man is made of the same minerals as stars.  Will that debate be worthwhile since man does not crystallize when he dies.

Why then did evolution enter the conscious of man.  If it is because of the Big Bang Theory, you are out of luck.  The Big Bang is not factual.  It is assumed all life came from an explosion.  Then all the actors fell into place.  That's hard to believe.  

Science has done marvelous wonders to advance the human race.  However, science has not concluded life's beginning to be anything except a theory.  You choose: Creation or Evolution.